Posts by Stephen Judd
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
Hard News: Dirty Politics, in reply to izogi,
Do Stuff writers get incentives for page loads?
Stuff as whole does. It's called "ad revenue."
-
Hard News: Dirty Politics, in reply to Stephen Judd,
I should note that Josie Pagani says she has never been shooting with Slater.
-
But this thing isn’t going to stop on September 20.
On the one hand, amazing prospects for Question Time. On the other hand, the current Speaker. Hmmm.
-
————————-
May 8, 2012
————————-
Jordan Williams, 5/8, 8:41amIs Josie pagani, john’s daughter?
————————-
Cameron Slater, 5/8, 8:41amWent shooting with her on Sunday
Yes, in the latest dump. An error of judgment indeed. If true. Which is something we need to keep in mind.
-
As side note, the claim that Josie Pagani had been hunting with Slater um... surprised me.
-
Speaker: Telling Our Own Tales, in reply to Simon Lyall,
The average person who lives in the North Island isn't responsible for your house not being fixed or insurance not being paid so stop talking like we are.
The votes of North Islanders and the moral pressure they exert on the nation's leadership make a difference. Please consider whether maybe that does imposes a responsibility on you.
AM I MY BROTHER'S KEEPER?
-
Reviving night classes is definitely on the agenda.
-
Also I really must work up that post on door knocking. It's been an incredibly educational experience.
-
Speaker: Why I'm standing in Ilam, in reply to Deborah,
I really, really appreciate the magnitude of the task you have taken on.
Thanks! And back atcha.
I'm playing with pivot tables in spreadsheets right now to try and figure out where best to direct volunteer effort instead of, I don't know, doing something fun. There so many houses in a block, so many target voters, it takes n hours to walk a block, blah blah mnskl b&^BHN >Gkvn
-
Hard News: Didn't see that coming, in reply to Raymond A Francis,
I think the Left should think about whose private stuff ends up in public before playing the dirty politics card
The issue is the public interest in the contents of the emails. No one is saying open season on private comms. It is the subject matter of the communications that justifies their release.
Here, the public interest is in collusion with a very nasty person, and possible abuse of the powers of office.
For what it's worth, I was quite anxious that it would turn out that someone from Labour was feeding stuff to Slater. And if they had I would take that on the chin.