Up Front: Choice, Bro
179 Responses
First ←Older Page 1 2 3 4 5 … 8 Newer→ Last
-
JoJo,
Quoting selectively from dubious sources? Sounds like standard behaviour for the anti-gay brigade.
Will be at the rally at parliament - after reading some of the bigots' thoughts in the papers and online, I could do with a good pro-me party.
-
JoJo,
-
Emma Hart, in reply to
The FUCK?
-
My initial response is that someone at ACT must have got to him and said "Oi, we're supposed to be classic liberals, not reactionary conservatives!' But if he really has made the decision based on human rights and basic decency, then good for him.
-
JoJo,
When asked why he was voting for it, he said "Because I am." Good to know he can still behave like a petulant child.
-
Heather Gaye, in reply to
Much as I'm happy for his support, I can't think of anything that'd convince me he's made this (or any) decision based on human rights and basic decency.
-
Tom Beard, in reply to
Which somewhat militates against the "human rights and basic decency" argument. Perhaps ACT on Campus have been a ... I'm struggling to write this ... force for good?
-
Emma Hart, in reply to
But if he really has made the decision based on human rights and basic decency, then good for him.
And I'd like to credit that, but his long history of utter bigoted hateful vitriol makes it... I don't know. I can't even. The fuck, etc.
-
And Twyford's a yes. Tide's turning.
-
I think we can rule out basic decency - more likely to be that ACT on Campus put the hard word on him. No enthusiasts for religious conservatism among his enthusiastic electorate helpers, I'll bet.
-
Rob Stowell, in reply to
And Twyford’s a yes. Tide’s turning.
Twyford and Banks since I looked earlier today. That’s movement!
(ETA- two NOT counting Twyford, in fact. So that's three.)
A few that have struggled and come out on the right side- David Carter, for example. Quietly pleased to see that. I reckon it’s the power of the fancy Herald graphical interface :)
And who wants to be on the wrong side of history (or the tide…?) -
Emma Hart, in reply to
And Twyford's a yes. Tide's turning.
It's easier on your shoes if you notice that before it's up to your ankles.
I sound bitter. I'm not. Tomorrow, I shall be crying my fucking eyes out when this bill passes its first reading.
-
From Steve Gray, on a discussion thread on Facebook:
he is a member of the act party and as we have known for months, despite his attempts at stalling, was always known he had to vote in live with the party
-
Great stuff, Emma. However, I like to think of Colin as basically an indecent man…
-
Thanks again Emma. A society that allows concepts like reparative therapy to exist, let alone have a platform, hardly seems a very healthy one. In fact not even a very humane one.
When Barrowman talks of how lucky he was he didn't stay in Scotland, and that he might have taken his own life, you get a sense of the real danger and harm that can come from entrenched, even institutionalised, intolerance.
It is time for a change. Long overdue in fact.
-
Emma Hart, in reply to
When Barrowman talks of how lucky he was he didn't stay in Scotland, and that he might have taken his own life
Extra poignancy for us because it's the realisation that Scotland didn't legalise homosexuality until... 1980.
-
JacksonP, in reply to
1980.
Beating us by 6 years. Highlighting why so many of our peers lived such traumatised lives in their adolescence, and beyond.
26 years is not a very long time ago. I still remember it for starters.
-
Islander, in reply to
I remember waaay before that...when spousal abuse aka 'domestic violence' was ignored by the police (forget about kids - that was just normal discipline) and hunting homos was regarded as a good sport by clean white straight male pub-denizens....
Things have actually changed for the better good people (and will change even betterer apopo!)
-
Great post, Emma. And imagine how we will all look back on this, incredulous that there could even have been a debate.
-
Excellent post, someone needs to call these spiteful little people out. It's crazy to think we're still having to debate and argue for these rights for people to simply live their lives how they wish.
-
Russell Brown, in reply to
I think we can rule out basic decency – more likely to be that ACT on Campus put the hard word on him. No enthusiasts for religious conservatism among his enthusiastic electorate helpers, I’ll bet.
I am quite sure this is the case.
For all his posturing, Banks knows the score in such matters.
-
But the bigots are only part of the problem.
It's now clear that MPs are pushing at an open door. Public opinion was either already there, or at least willing to be persuaded.
But for years (and still) we've heard so many politicians find every possible reason not to engage. Not to oppose, just - not to talk about it (as Emma's previous post skewered so well). That's about more than just one issue - you get the same kind of waffle across a whole range (e.g. a republic is "inevitable", said Clark and Key, while refusing to do anything about it).
I'm not going to doff my cap and be 'umbly grateful to MPs who constantly tell us that doing something simple (which they also think is right) is "not our focus" or "something I'm not uncomfortable with' or "not something we're putting out there" (the last was David Shearer's). Is it so hard to say "I think we should do X because Y"? Not least because - to speak the language they understand - maybe it would impress the voters?
Memo to our MPs: Martin Luther King's speech is remembered, and it's not because he said "I am at this time not opposed to having a conversation about the issues around a dream". Would you like us to remember you?
-
Islander, in reply to
ou get the same kind of waffle across a whole range (e.g. a republic is “inevitable”, said Clark and Key, while refusing to do anything about it).
Yes indeed - or not* in deed*-
we KNOW politicians are unreliable in their promises & almost promises - how can we best show that we utterly despise their prevarications?
-
I shouldn't think Banks' conversion came at the hands of ACT on Campus, but from the Board. As much of a sham as they've become, they couldn't walk against such a basic concept of personal liberty...
I really can't fathom this not passing into law (not just this first reading hurdle). Feels like I may be jinxing it but surely? -
FletcherB, in reply to
Memo to our MPs: Martin Luther King’s speech is remembered, and it’s not because he said “I am at this time not opposed to having a conversation about the issues around a dream”. Would you like us to remember you?
Word...
But then, he got shot rather than elected again, which is what most of them are aiming for...
Post your response…
This topic is closed.