Posts by robbery
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
gotcha
you're the best arguer out there steve, you go for it mate, knock yourself out.
-
would make the use of the word 'murder' perfectly acceptable usage.
now that's a rebuttal.
why didn't you say that 10 pages ago. -
hence the ‘you must think he’s dense’ angle
I don't get the name calling angle of your comments steve.
didn't we drop that stuff when we left high school.There is bitchy history re me and russell but aside from that I address the issues, refrain from name calling or verbal abuse and do try and stick to the topic. It's nice that you weigh in for russell, sad that you think you need to, and unfortunate that you feel I have no point. I'm not entirely sure what the point you're trying to make is either.
I've always argued in good faith. in a field of the written word definition I would have thought was all important to the message you wish to convey. if we can't understand the meaning of what each other is trying to say then we just get misunderstanding.
apparently the exact definition of some words is still up for debate and the use of some of these words is making people's message unclear. maybe that's the intended result. I hope not.
-
I think I just figured out how the copyright thread got to 100 pages.
come on tiso, you filled a lot of those pages with your continual harping on at poor old mark and his 'word'. I'm not taking the blame for that. and its 104 pages thank you very much.
-
how does it need "acknowledging"?
it needs to be remembered
and yeah, it was poorly worded,
I should have specifically said in PA or in articles where it is specifically from Russell's personal point of view.
its got nothing to do with dense, its got to do with continually challenging the information we get, what we read hear and see.
Is there a problem with that? -
could have sworn I posted a link to an international torrent site which promotes the downloading of new zealand content in the form of the tv series outrageous fortune, for those of you who think it doesn't effect us here.
I take it proof in the form of a link isn't cool. fair enough, but I did post it. -
Is he just a bit dim, then?
yeah, thats it steve, well spotted.
can I step out of this one now so you can get on with your beat up of the next guy?
I did say leave me out of this, and I don't know why some don't learn, just don't mention me in your posts that I have no interest in and I'm not here, simple as that, you'd think, -
I just don't see what Rob's point was with that 'it should be acknowledged' comment.
my point was Brickley was going at it like this was a court of law and its an opinion site. Brickley had a point, but the point didn't really matter to this forum, it would have mattered in a court of law, but not here.
You get used to it.
really?, and you have a go at me with what you perceive to be loaded insult comments. that one was straight up and to the point.
-
Really, I'm tired of this.
then stop with the last wordism and move on.
so someone disagrees with you, big deal. you're old enough to handle it and either debunk it or avoid it.
if I'm all it takes to undo you bring on the real terrorists.
I disagree with you on some things. only some. not everything.
get back to your chat with Brickley, it was interesting. -
I do have a bit of a range.
agreed,
speaking specifically re PA.
I'm thinking the whole issue of blogs take over for newspapers which is dangerous. It doesn't undermine the validity of what you do here but its important to remember and be clear what is fact and what is opinion, an not take offense when the difference is pointed out.
people (including myself sometimes) do fall into that trap of forgetting where they are.