Posts by Jeremy Eade
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
" I thought it was a pretty charmless swipe in the first place.":
It's hardly a scandal to note his strong National Party leanings. But yes it lacks charm for sure.
-
"That is a full frontal attack on my personal and professional integrity, and I'm just not going to wear it Jeremy."
It's hardly a scandal to note your strong National Party leanings , if you want poiltical integrity then earn it.
-
"I've never kept on the downlow that I'm a member of the National Party, and was an officeholder in the Wellington Young Nats back in the 90's. And shock! horror! my POV on all kind of topics is ever so slightly rightward of your average PAS reader/contributor. I don't know if you've noticed, but PA isn't some kind of ideological circle jerk or Labour Party/left-wing country club where other POVs aren't welcome." - craig
Well I didn't know your past but it kind of stacks up to what I think..but I'm glad we've gone back to civil discussion.
Graeme has done a great job pointing out the rules but its hard for members of nick de angelos 'masses" not to look at what the rules are trying to promote and disagree with the rules and also question why we are revisting the question of child violence again...
hitting children is disgusting, hitting anyone is digusting..
and on the subject of hitting when anyone talks about slapping me (even conceptually) i get quite fucked off and defensive.
but for the record I've never belonged to a political party and I see this blog as a place of generally informed education and debate. If it has a left wing slant in anyones eyes that's possibly a critique on what stands for conservatism today.
-
"How accepting would you be of the 'cheering the team' comment directed at yourself." - sam f
If that's what you think that's something i will have to consider...but just to throw it back at me as some form of rebuttal is poor.
-
How accepting would you be of the 'cheering the team' comment directed at yourself.
If that's what you think that's something i will have to consider...but just to throw it back at me as some form of rebuttal is poor.
-
i meant write about the topic but if ya can't take criticism and you want to tell people you are going to slap them (idiot term )you've got to expect and deseve the odd 'fuck off'
grow up, look at your writing, accept the comment. You come across as a man widly in love with the national party so don't be suprised to here that as a criticism.
grow up.
-
"And sometimes, Jeremy, I resist the urge to give snide comments like that the slap they deserve. Aren't you a lucky bugger that this is one of them?"
the slap? shut up and write.
-
"My view is that would prefer general elections remain just that: exclusively focused on electing the government on the basis of a broad range of policies. "
well put, and Nick we are the masses.
-
'we should delay the CIR so we can have more time to convince the masses we are right.'
SO discussion is a bad thing , it's violence buddy, it deserves discussion.
-
"Helen Clark doesn't want this issue on the radar during a campaign that, if the polls hold, is going to be ugly enough."
Sometimes man i really think you're just cheering the team. This issue by definition of it's importance enough to raise a referendum is now on the political radar (media shows) but something as important as child abuse needs its own isolated time, it's a biggie, smacking kids is a biggie.