sorry steve i may not have been clear. the only people within my community who are obsessed with the marriage act (pop quiz - name the 2 differences between the marriage act and civil union act), are people raised in religion and/or still religious. the issues facing gltq people, and nz society at large are far more pressing concerns for all of us than 2 differnces in legislation, one of which is already being addressed with a bi-partisan working party.

russell, if posters to youtube have turned embedding off, you just take the address from the bar and is exactly like embedding. a very cool cheat. hope thats kinda clear x

http://gayblade.blogspot.co.nz/?zx=733d4a7628f56920 Michael Stevens, once again, sums up perfectly how I feel.

there are only two differences betwixt the marriage act and the civil unions act. one is already being addressed with the adoption act bipartisan party review. as people seem obsessed with finding out if people are against change due to religious reasons, I have heard that Louisa is religious and want to know what her motivation is. And shouting 'IT"S TIME' is just disingenuous. we are gay, not straight, and nor do we want or need heteronormalized existences.
x and hi keri.

Will louisa Wall be up front about her own dearly held Christian views and that she is supporting this bill, and let us be honest, there is only 2 bits of difference between the civil unions act and the marriage act, 2 differences, it seems an awful lot of energy is going into this bill, which is happening because Louisa is a Christian and wants to marry in her 'Gods' eyes. waste of energy and time.