Posts by Sacha
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
Speaker: The economics of shit speech, in reply to linger,
what, dis stain?
-
Hard News: Cabinet and the Reeferendum, in reply to andin,
They are bound to travel on something like this, surely.
-
Hard News: Cabinet and the Reeferendum, in reply to simon g,
where do they get their ideas from?
Republicans
-
Nats twisting and turning like a twisty turny thing about joining the constructive cross-party process.
-
Hard News: Cabinet and the Reeferendum, in reply to simon g,
There are many ways to fatally dilute a proposed law while pretending to agree with it, as Winston and the Nats both know.
-
To guarantee a change, citizens will need to:
- lobby the govt consultation process, and
- vote yes in the reeferendum, and
- re-elect the current govt, and
- ensure party vote proportions do not shift coalition power towards those who are likely to dilute the law after the election.Resisters gonna resist.
-
I imagine Russell will be writing something more detailed but in the meantime, here's the actual Cabinet paper (pdf, 30 pages).
-
Speaker: The economics of shit speech, in reply to Pete Sime,
Thank you. That is certainly a better deal than the Harold is offering.
-
Speaker: The economics of shit speech, in reply to Pete Sime,
is it free to use?
-
Speaker: The economics of shit speech, in reply to BenWilson,
Libraries, coffeeshops, etc.