Posts by Danielle
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
Hard News: Welfare: Back to the Future?, in reply to
How magnanimous.
-
Hard News: Welfare: Back to the Future?, in reply to
That's actually sadistic. How disgusting.
(I'm starting to feel like Butch and Sundance, because I'm asking "who ARE these guys?" in tones of horror so often.)
-
Rebuking each other for 'inappropriate' remarks will also be a great help, of course.
-
Hard News: Welfare: Back to the Future?, in reply to
Thank you for saying that, B, because I hadn't thought of it in quite that way, and I was *already* ragey.
(Also, yeah, the 'free contraception' thing? That's all about getting the inferior po' folks to stop breeding, eugenics styles. Don't be fooled, anyone.)
-
Well, that counts me out, then.
-
Up Front: Say When, in reply to
Quality always wins, no matter the length.
Do you realise how difficult it is NOT to make a smutty joke in response to that sentence? Huh? Do you?
(Megan, I too am down with awesome long posts.)
-
Oh. Also. Not that it helps one jot, really, but I imagine that there are quite a number of us who think you should be legally allowed to have as many spouses as you like, Tracy. <raises hand in a voting 'aye' fashion>
-
Up Front: Say When, in reply to
+1. For example, if Sally had been talking about unrealistic beauty standards *without* having a go at other women’s, uh, gender performativity (she says, wankishly) then I don’t think this would have gone badly at all.
ETA Noting that even in general terms, I think her argument may still be indefensible. It just would have been a better discussion.
-
Up Front: Say When, in reply to
I am throwing out allof my dresses right now.
Can I have them? I'm totally not cured.
-
His Italian diction is even worse than Lesley Gore's, which is saying something.
Well, what started me on this whole thing were the Beatles' German singles, so I challenge you to find shittier diction than theirs (and I don't even *speak* German).