Posts by pollywog
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
So to rephrase, you think legislation intended to protect gay rights is only going to benefit lawyers, and at some point humanity is just going to evolve to the point where the universal consciousness will click over towards love and tolerance?
laws that discriminate against people are abhorrent. get rid of them as we have done but to substitute laws protecting rights is to swing the pendulum as much to the exrtreme left as before. they don't work. it didnt in the treaty and it doesnt where it interferes with capitalist expansion. if its in the best interest of lawyers to make law suits and command consultancy fees using a gay agenda then thats the benefit but it hardly translates to the underclass.
if you dont think we're evolving then we're de-evolving cos we're not in stasis, so it's inevitable that the next stage wil be a form of unlocking the potential of our brains, expanding consciousness and all that entails blah blah blah...
-
And I'd rather work together now to be less hateful than wait for some genetic miracle.
i'd rather not waste my time on lost causes and trust that we as humans are evolving to a higher conscious state sooner rather than later without invoking miraculous divine intervention.
Being better to underprivileged groups doesn't just naturally happen because privileged people decide to be magnanimous. It takes activism on the part of the underprivileged people, sometimes for centuries.
it does happen naturally if you view it in the grand scheme of things rather than 'the biased history of the west' but having shit enshrined in law still wont change attitudes bred from ignorance and punishng people for it wont make them change for the better, if anything the opposite holds true.
and WTF is that marine technology line about ?
-
By the same 'attitude', do you mean allowing other people to be themselves? Not being allowed to have a go at someone because they're one of those filthy breeders? Only hiring people like 'us'?
we're not growing out of that ?. we'll evolve genetically thru some as yet unknown trigger release and expand our consciousness to be more tolerant, less hateful. making more stupid laws to keep lawyers in business isnt gonna hasten that process or make us 'grow'. as though laws make any difference to what we choose to do like when it was illegal to be gay.
and i was talking more about denigrating the author but the implication of trolling by someone who cant even differentiate between spoof and troof and is so blinkered by her own attitudes towrds sex comes close:)
-
It's just hard to treat anything like your complete and utter bollocks of a post with anything remotely serious.
Besides the serious responses have all been said before and most of us get tired of repeating it. You have fixed ideas and my guess is you don't really want to hear opposing views or even worse see facts that undermine your view.
oh but i do want opposing views backed up by facts, more so than 'i love teh cock' responses and will fuck anything that moves cos i'm greedy and dont give a shit cos 'its all me al the time', having fun and getting off is what lifes all about and fuck everyone else.
c'mon hotshot quit guessing and put up or shut the fuck up !
-
They are not demanding that everyone be like them.
GLBT's do demand in legislation that everyone have the same attitude like them and of course there is no denigrating of those who are not like them going on here using the loudhailer of a national current affairs blog...is there ?
so how do you think the new anti-hate speech laws in the west is gonna pan out ?
-
How about we perhaps practice a little humanity? Dude, you're brown: you might want to remind yourself what some people used to say about the evolutionary fitness of brown folks. It's a rotten way to think about people.
oh right, that's the humanity that the enlightened and sexually liberated west imposes on the under evolved rest ?
how about we drop the facade and stop pretending we're nothing more than cavemen with laptops, one step above the animal world.
it's all about evolution and lest face it some of us are just a waste of time and space but whos to decide and enact the humane practise of cullling ?
as for fitness of brown folk and what used to be said. sticks and stone bruh'. polynesians are the ultimate hybrid. fitter and more able to survive than most. even our attitudes toward f'aa fafine is way more evolved than most:)
-
Please tell me there are cool uniforms.
nah, no uniforms just weird costumes, stupid haircuts and tonnes of makeup to showcase the 'real' and totally liberated you. available for exorbitant prices at all decent haute couture boutiques, private spas and beauty salons.
oh and dont forget to wax that crack cos all us next level evolved peeps love teh 12yr old clean shaven orifice steez unless you're a sheep, in which case just make sure you get most of the larger daggs off:)
-
i guess this particular hole doesnt go very deep at all...
...so lets just all make superficial quips and pretend we're all so fucking enlightened. its just wayyyy easier
-
I was hoping there'd be some robust defence of Bindel. I'm interested in hearing a case for her.
she calls it as she sees it
she has as much right to express her opinion as vociferously as the overt gays and trannies in expressing their right to sexual freedom. her opinion is as valid as those who think otherwise. restecp teh differencez:)
I assume the weirdo extreme line of reasoning behind the gross transsexual bigotry goes something like this: if *all* gender is socially constructed rather than biologically determined, transsexual people are therefore full of crap and cannot possibly be trapped in the wrong body, because there is no such thing. They're just messing with us by reconstructing their own gender for some sort of nefarious purpose. Which... yeah, crackers. And horrible.
if evoultion is decided by survival of the fittest then i gotta say trannies wouldn't generally be fit. they cant breed for one thing and that one thing counts for everything in survial of the species. then theres the resources and time to re hormonise and reconstruct the genitalia which may have been better re prioritised towards, i dunno starving kids in africa maybe ?
lets not confuse our wants and desires with our compulsions and needs which are biologically determined.
i suppose that means i'm in the extremely bigoted, weird and horribly crackers troop while the pro trannie brigade are all enlightened and highly evolved individuals totally liberated from the social political construct ?
-
clearly there are other dimensions to heterosexuality.
oh you mean like procreation of the species:)
what i find funny is how some think that our attitudes towards sex/ homosex is the sole measure of our state of personal/public evolution.
say someone graduated from bi sex and inanimate objects to animal sex. would that person have attained a higher and more developed state of sexual evolution or be a deviant and be worthy of praise or derision for it ?
if it comes down to consent with animals. are we not animals ? even our pets consent in allowing us certain freedoms towards them and if nurtured, an animal would willingly consent to sex, as our partners may over time warm to the idea of anal sex and foreign objects whereby at the start of a relationship they may not have.
you gotta draw a line somewhere and create boudaries. and i don't quite buy the genetic thing. yeah sure there may be genes which give a propensity towards gayness maybe even bestialism but we can override them. to say we cant is to say we polynesians cant override our 'warrior gene' that compels us towards anti socialism.