Posts by conseismal
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
(in this hallowed moment of apparent mediative pause i'd like to restate if i may my intense curiosity as to the contradiction i do perceive at work/play in the indications of more than one person here that they are fiercely dedicated to the vicissitudes (sheee!) of their pathologically-described chilluns on the one hand but have no truck whatsoever with the slightest hint of incoherence manifesting itself rite here within their precious blogosphere )
-
what means the phrase plz 'christ on a stick'?
i have also heard 'sex on a stick' (a man gesturing at aston martin)the stick i rememba moist in NZ was that of the man from said
"dna squad" who obliged me to run his around my gums for about 10 minutes before i was allowed to take delivery of my replacement passport and leave yr country..whole biz proceeded from incident of arrest after i'd pocketed on impulse pack of refill razors at supermak't checkout on finding i had not enuff change to pay for..
seem'd wildly aggressive pursuit of me-kins to me
perhaps they just knowed i wz a troll, aeleast i aint no.. mallowpuff
-
this little trollop is gratified and even - lord, lord, say it ain't so! - encouraged to see that Mr Dalziel's is no dull zeal and that he appears to be familiar with what is meant by 'immanentizing the eschaton" ..can only hop about hoping that he takes time out to do some hardcore reading of Voegelin, IF (an aerial) he has not in fact already done so... me still bristling it must be said at the routine charge of "incoherence" last night, when it seemed pretty damn obvious what i was inviting (in what i believed to be "good faith") those present here to do - in the service of all truthiness and troth to fearlessly try and revisit that moment in evenemential time when they first gave their assent to ACC (whoops acronyllision there) .. as distingusihed from the realisation that 'everybody else' now believed in this and they'd better fall in line or be branded as heretic.. i take media moguls (heh..) like RB dead seriously when they say that they "think for themselves" even whilst being scenically mediated to within an inch of their lives, so..
(so, GT, i use a few odd words here and there; what's it to ya Moby Dick?)
-
((oh me, oh my, what to say? what a silly bunch of very unadventurous old cows !!!))
-
oh Herr Tiso pray tell, what PART of this do you not understand?
(and if Tagmond was 'provoked' she must have, partly at least, understood, right?)
once more w feelingbut i was a bit disturbed to see the outright condemnation on PA of onee of yr fellow NZ journalists for sampling from another one (in Oz) without acknowledgement - a real part of me thinks that the less Names we have before us to accuse the more the *ideas in themselves* (those anecdata, as you would have it), might have the chance to freely circulate - and is this not sort of like the ideal we are after? And if not, why not?
i would almost be so foolish as to ask for a recapitulation to be performed by all hands on deck at this juncture as to the first recallable moment each might manage as to when the thought of anthropogenic climate change first-of-all compelled yr attention, your intellectual assent even - iow, can every one of you clearly remember a time *before* there was simply an orthodoxy in place versus a roving band of heretics/denialists? And are you prepared to re-locate these events for the record?
-
so simply by (lazily) deploying the sign of 'provocation' you can consign my enquiry to hell just like that, huh?
-
may i say i very much like "..playing the racist card and the MSM like a cheap fiddle"
but i was a bit disturbed to see the outright condemnation on PA of one of yr fellow NZ journalists for sampling from another one (in Oz) without acknowledgement - a real part of me thinks that the less Names we have before us to accuse the more the *ideas in themselves* (those anecdata, as you would have it), might have the chance to freely circulate - and is this not sort of like the ideal we are after? And if not, why not?
i would almost be so foolish as to ask for a recapitulation to be performed by all hands on deck at this juncture as to the first recallable moment each might manage as to when the thought of anthropogenic climate change first-of-all compelled yr attention, your intellectual assent even - iow, can every one of you clearly remember a time *before* there was simply an orthodoxy in place versus a roving band of heretics/denialists? And are you prepared to re-locate these events for the record?
sending in the probe again
p -
(and quite possibly related in its own rite
to 'i use tampons and crampons'
as performed by the incredible
chart-clawing kwi combo
Chiefly About the Ranges) -
Swing low sweet chariot, come down easy
Taxi to the terminal zone;
Cut your engines, cool your wings,
And let me make it to the telephone.Los Angeles give me Norfolk Virginia,
Tidewater four ten O nine
Tell the folks back home this is the promised land callin'
And the poor boy's on the line
i crash parties and maseratis feels kind of.. like a broken line
compared to that which gave one the compulsion and purely rhythmic rationale to rhyme and get rhyming in the .. first place.. -
an increedibly hot discussion, even for a troll! (but i have been advised, by that nice man Gordon Campbell over at yonder werewolf nz dot com, that even trolls can be nice people too, as witness his referring me to the 'moomintrolls' who he sez were therapists in their very own right!) And even the most withering of you must admit that trolls = a tiny bit of excitement plus! My own angle to the eva evanescent centre at this moment then would be to draw some attention at least to the evident iterability of that sign of what has here been called "anecdata", and why THIS term has been chosen over that of the normal 'anecdotes' we otherwise fully expected to come trolling down the pike.. ? is there some sort of deferral of conflict entailed right there within the significantskin of this thusly rendered scene? yrsin error and trial...